Continually Updated Clinical Reference
 
 
  All Sources     eMedicine     Medscape     Drug Reference     MEDLINE
 
eMedicine - Cardiomyopathy, Restrictive : Article by

Quick Find
Authors & Editors
Introduction
Differentials
Radiograph
CT SCAN
MRI
Ultrasound
Nuclear Medicine
Angiography
Intervention
Multimedia
References

Related Articles
Carcinoid, Gastrointestinal

Constrictive Pericarditis

Hemochromatosis

Multiple Myeloma

Sarcoidosis, Thoracic

Scleroderma, Thoracic




Patient Education
Heart Center

Procedures Center

Atrial Fibrillation Overview

Atrial Fibrillation Causes

Atrial Fibrillation Symptoms

Atrial Fibrillation Treatment

Congestive Heart Failure Overview

Heart and Lung Transplant Overview




Author: Elizabeth McGuigan, MD, Assistant Professor of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences; Consulting Staff, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Naval Medical Center

Elizabeth McGuigan is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Women Radiologists, American Roentgen Ray Society, and Radiological Society of North America

Editors: Justin D Pearlman, MD, PhD, ME, MA, Director of Dartmouth Advanced Imaging Center, Professor of Medicine, Professor of Radiology, Adjunct Professor, Thayer Bioengineering and Computer Science, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand; Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute; Eugene C Lin, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center

Author and Editor Disclosure

Synonyms and related keywords: infiltrative cardiomyopathy, idiopathic restrictive cardiomyopathy, primary restrictive cardiomyopathy, restrictive cardiac disease, constrictive pericarditis

Background

Restrictive cardiomyopathy or restrictive cardiac disease is defined by abnormal diastolic function and relatively well-preserved systolic function (at least in the early stages of the disease). Clinically, restrictive cardiomyopathy is difficult to distinguish from the treatable condition termed constrictive pericarditis. In 1981, Shabetai proposed a working definition of restrictive cardiomyopathy as "an idiopathic or systemic disease of the ventricular chambers that produces a clinical and hemodynamic picture that strongly simulates constrictive pericarditis" (Shabetai, 1981).

Although patients with idiopathic heart disease have presented with restrictive cardiomyopathy, the term restrictive cardiomyopathy usually refers to a group of primary or secondary infiltrative disorders involving the myocardium in which the heart chambers are unable to fill properly and cannot pump blood efficiently. The decreased heart function affects the lungs, liver, and other body systems.

Restrictive cardiomyopathy is rare in the United States and most other industrialized nations. In general, restrictive cardiomyopathy does not appear to be inherited; however, some of the diseases that lead to the condition are transmitted genetically.

For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Heart Center and Procedures Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education articles Atrial Fibrillation, Congestive Heart Failure, and Heart and Lung Transplant.

Pathophysiology

In restrictive cardiomyopathy, the underlying physiologic problem is abnormal diastolic function. Typically, diastolic filling pressures are elevated, and filling terminates relatively early in diastole. Early in the clinical course, systolic function is relatively well preserved. Signs and symptoms of heart failure are present, but the ventricles are not hypertrophic or dilated, and the left ventricular ejection fraction is normal or only slightly diminished, indicating that contractility is preserved.

Frequency

United States

Restrictive cardiomyopathy occurs rarely in the United States and most other industrial nations, with an estimated prevalence of approximately 1 case per 1000 people. In children, dilated cardiomyopathy occurs more commonly than restrictive disease.

International

See In the US above.

Mortality/Morbidity

Few medical therapies are known to be effective in the treatment of restrictive cardiomyopathy. The goal of treatment is to control symptoms to improve the patient's quality of life. Pediatric patients often are considered for early cardiac transplantation.

  • Expectations and prognosis: The probable outcome is poor, with a 5-year survival rate of 30%, and treatment is usually not effective. The condition tends to worsen with time, but some people with restrictive cardiomyopathy may be candidates for heart transplantation. Restrictive cardiomyopathy results in a worse prognosis in children than in adults.
  • Complications: Lethal arrhythmias, progressive heart failure and liver dysfunction are complications of restrictive cardiomyopathy.

Race

Restrictive cardiomyopathy is not race specific, though some of the underlying conditions can be seen more frequently in certain races. For instance, sarcoidosis is more common in black females.

Sex

No definite sex predilection exists in restrictive cardiomyopathy.

Age

Restrictive cardiomyopathy affects persons of all ages.

Anatomy

Although symptoms of congestive heart failure may predominate, the heart remains relatively small in restrictive cardiomyopathy, unlike other cardiomyopathies. The key to distinguishing restrictive cardiomyopathy from constrictive pericarditis is the thickness of the pericardium. If constrictive pericarditis is implicated, improvement after removal of pericardium excludes restrictive cardiomyopathy. Calcification of the pericardium also implicates constrictive pericarditis. In the postoperative patient, the visceral pericardium can constrict the heart without being abnormally thick.

Clinical Details

Symptoms

Symptoms of restrictive cardiomyopathy include fatigue, edema, cough, shortness of breath with exertion and poor exercise tolerance, orthopnea, and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea. Other symptoms include nausea, bloating, and poor appetite.

Signs are the same as those of heart failure, including jugular venous distension, crackles in the lungs on auscultation, distant heart sounds, and lower extremity edema.

Diagnostic testing

Diagnostic tests include ECG, echocardiography, coronary angiography, chest radiography, CT, and MRI.

Diagnostic criteria include the absence of cardiomegaly on chest radiographs, although findings consistent with pulmonary venous hypertension can be seen. On echocardiography, ventricular walls appear normal or symmetrically thickened, and the hallmark is rapid early diastolic filling and slow late diastolic filling with normal or slightly reduced ventricular volume and systolic function.

On cardiac catheterization, the ventricular end-diastolic pressure is elevated, with a dip-and-plateau configuration of the diastolic portion of the ventricular pressure pulse. The ejection fraction is normal to slightly decreased, and X and Y descent are prominent.

Differential Diagnosis

Restrictive cardiomyopathy may be difficult to differentiate from constrictive pericarditis. MRI is a useful noninvasive diagnostic tool in this situation because it clearly demonstrates the thickness of the pericardium and because it can provide additional information to aid in the diagnosis of some of the infiltrative conditions that cause restrictive heart disease.

In the evaluation of constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy, advanced imaging techniques such as CT and MRI play a crucial role in diagnosis. As many as 50% of patients with constrictive pericarditis do not have a calcified pericardium, and a slightly thickened pericardium can be demonstrated in some patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy. Analysis of a myocardial biopsy specimen may be necessary to make the diagnosis.

Endomyocardial biopsy may be used to confirm the diagnosis. In some patients, surgical exploration is the only means by which to definitely distinguish restrictive cardiomyopathy from constrictive pericarditis, although a systematic search for the correct diagnosis often obviates exploratory thoracotomy or sternotomy.

Findings of hyperkinetic ventricular free wall and ventricular hypertrophy are characteristic of hypertrophic cardiomyopathies.

Treatment

Restrictive cardiomyopathy has no specific treatment. Looking for an underlying cause is important. However, even if a primary condition is identified, the underlying disease may not be curable, and heart transplantation may be necessary. Heart transplantation may be considered if the patient's heart function is poor.

Various medications, such as calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-II blockers, and nitric oxide donor compounds, may be used to control symptoms. Diuretics may help somewhat in removing fluid, but excessive use can worsen the patient's symptoms. In general, use of traditional cardiac drugs has been limited in restrictive cardiomyopathy, though diuretics may help control fluid accumulation, and cardiac drugs (eg, calcium channel blockers) may be considered.

Preferred Examination

MRI, which is primarily based on pericardial examination, has high sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy (88%, 100%, and 93%, respectively) in differentiating restrictive cardiomyopathy from constrictive pericarditis.

CT has a similar ability to assess pericardial thickness and a higher ability to detect pericardial calcification. MRI, CT, and echocardiography can also demonstrate early termination of left ventricular filling.

Echocardiography alone is not definitive because the hemodynamic properties of restrictive cardiomyopathy and constrictive pericarditis are similar, and the pericardial thickness may be evaluated incompletely.

Limitations of Techniques

MRI is poor in identifying calcification. CT involves ionizing radiation, and many systems do not enable a dynamic evaluation of filling. Echocardiography may be limited by inadequate echo-lucent windows, and important clues of pericardial thickness can be missed because of near-field and far-field effects.



Carcinoid, Gastrointestinal
Constrictive Pericarditis
Hemochromatosis
Multiple Myeloma
Sarcoidosis, Thoracic
Scleroderma, Thoracic

Other Problems to be Considered

Amyloidosis
Idiopathic origin
Loeffler syndrome
Hypereosinophilic syndrome
Endomyocardial fibrosis
Noneosinophilic primary restrictive cardiomyopathy
Pseudoxanthoma
Radiation therapy effects
Posttransplantation effects
Glycogen storage disease
Chloroquine effects (1 case report)



Findings

Conventional chest radiographs can demonstrate the typical appearance of congestive heart failure but without cardiomegaly. Plain images may also demonstrate normal findings, showing neither cardiomegaly nor congestive heart failure.

Degree of Confidence

Conventional radiographs are used in conjunction with echocardiography and MRI findings. Chest radiograph findings are not definitive in the evaluation of restrictive cardiac disease, particularly when the clinical concern is whether the patient has constrictive pericarditis versus restrictive cardiomyopathy.

False Positives/Negatives

Plain radiographic findings may be normal, demonstrating neither cardiomegaly nor congestive failure.



Findings

CT is not especially useful in the evaluation of restrictive cardiomyopathy; however, in the face of appropriate hemodynamics, pericardial calcification may indicate pericardial constriction, and thus exclude the diagnosis of restriction. While calcification of the pericardium is a finding associated with constrictive pericarditis, not restrictive cardiomyopathy, absence of calcium is not a diagnostic discriminator. Of patients with constrictive pericarditis, 50% do not have findings of a calcified pericardium however thickening of the pericardium may occur in the absence of calcification.

Degree of Confidence

Advanced imaging techniques may not be sufficient to make the diagnosis, necessitating myocardial biopsy.

False Positives/Negatives

Although a thickened pericardium (>4 mm) is associated with constrictive pericarditis, some patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy can have a mildly thickened pericardium.



Findings

MRI is a sophisticated, accurate, noninvasive tool that is well suited to the evaluation of the morphology and function of the heart. In restrictive cardiomyopathy, the thickness of the pericardium ( <4 mm) is a key finding.

Ventricular hypertrophy is not associated with restrictive cardiomyopathy, but some degree of thickening can be seen on both cross-sectional imaging and echocardiography in infiltrative restrictive cardiac disease (eg, amyloidosis or hemochromatosis).

Degree of Confidence

A diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis (excluding restrictive cardiomyopathy) can be made on the basis of pericardial thickness, with a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 93%.

False Positives/Negatives

Patients with a prior history of cardiac surgery or pericardiotomy can have a thickened pericardium without a constrictive physiologic pattern. Conversely, in the postoperative patient, the visceral pericardium can constrict the heart without being abnormally thick.



Findings

Echocardiography is often part of the patient's evaluation.

Normal ventricular size and systolic function usually are evident in restrictive cardiomyopathy.

Findings that have been described as helpful in diagnosing restrictive cardiomyopathy include mid diastolic reversal of flow across the mitral and tricuspid valves.

Atrial enlargement with normal left ventricular end-diastolic dimensions can be seen.

Typically, patients with constrictive pericarditis have a thickened pericardium and marked respiratory variation during diastole.

A recent study showed that Doppler myocardial velocity gradients, as measured from the left ventricular posterior wall during the predetermined phases of the cardiac cycle, are lower in patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy than in patients with constrictive pericarditis.

Degree of Confidence

Echocardiography may be limited by inadequate echo-lucent windows, and it may not be sufficient for evaluation of pericardial thickness. In this case, CT or MRI is the next step.

False Positives/Negatives

Restrictive cardiomyopathy might not be distinguishable from constrictive pericarditis on the basis of echocardiography alone.



Findings

Nuclear medicine is not used frequently in the initial diagnosis of restrictive cardiomyopathy.



Findings

Angiography is less helpful than CT or MRI in the evaluation of restrictive cardiomyopathy.



Unlike constrictive pericarditis, which is treatable by pericardiectomy, restrictive cardiomyopathy refers to a set of progressive conditions that essentially are incurable short of heart transplantation. Patients are treated symptomatically or with palliative measures.

An additional diagnostic test is cardiac catheterization for pressure and flow measurements.

Medical/Legal Pitfalls

  • Failure to identify the potentially treatable pericardial cause of nonenlarged heart failure
  • Failure to warn patients about expected complications

See also the Medscape topic Medical Malpractice and Legal Issues.



Media file 1:  Restrictive cardiomyopathy. Axial double inversion-recovery MRI of the heart in a 30-year-old woman with sarcoid demonstrates a normal pericardium.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  MRI

Media file 2:  Restrictive cardiomyopathy. Axial contrast-enhanced CT image through the heart (same patient as in Image 1) shows a thin pericardium without calcification. Note the cardiophrenic and internal mammary lymph nodes. The patient had extensive mediastinal and hilar adenopathy, as well as interstitial lung changes.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  CT



  • Ammash NM, Seward JB, Bailey KR, et al. Clinical profile and outcome of idiopathic restrictive cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2000;101(21):2490-6. [Medline][Full Text].
  • Artz G, Wynne J. Restrictive cardiomyopathy. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. Oct 2000;2(5):431-8.
  • Backes RJ, Gersh BJ. Cardiomyopathies in the elderly. Cardiovasc Clin. 1992;22(2):105-25. [Medline].
  • Berger PB, Duffy J, Reeder GS, et al. Restrictive cardiomyopathy associated with the eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc. Feb 1994;69(2):162-5. [Medline].
  • Celletti F, Fattori R, Napoli G, et al. Assessment of restrictive cardiomyopathy of amyloid or idiopathic etiology by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol. Mar 1 1999;83(5):798-801, A10. [Medline].
  • Cheitlin MD, Alpert JS, Armstrong WF, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the clinical application of echocardiography: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Clinical Application of Echocardiography). J Am Coll Cardiol. Mar 15 1997;29(4):862-79. [Medline].
  • Delius RE. Congenital Heart Surgery Nomenclature and Database Project: pediatric cardiomyopathies and end-stage congenital heart disease. Ann Thorac Surg. Apr 2000;69(4 Suppl):S180-90. [Medline].
  • Felker GM, Hu W, Hare JM, et al. The spectrum of dilated cardiomyopathy. The Johns Hopkins experience with 1,278 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). Jul 1999;78(4):270-83. [Medline].
  • Iglesias Cubero G, Rodriguez Reguero JJ, Rojo Ortega JM. Restrictive cardiomyopathy caused by chloroquine. Br Heart J. May 1993;69(5):451-2. [Medline].
  • Lewis AB. Clinical profile and outcome of restrictive cardiomyopathy in children. Am Heart J. Jun 1992;123(6):1589-93. [Medline].
  • Mandinov L, Eberli FR, Seiler C, Hess OM. Diastolic heart failure. Cardiovasc Res. Mar 2000;45(4):813-25. [Medline].
  • Martins C, Cotrim C, Tomaz A, et al. Restrictive cardiomyopathy due to hypereosinophilic syndrome. Rev Port Cardiol. Apr 2000;19(4):499-501. [Medline].
  • Masui T, Finck S, Higgins CB. Constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology. Feb 1992;182(2):369-73. [Medline].
  • Meaney E, Shabetai R, Bhargava V, et al. Cardiac amyloidosis, contrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. NOV 4 1976;38(5):547-56. [Medline].
  • Mertens LL, Denef B, De Geest H. The differentiation between restrictive cardiomyopathy and constrictive pericarditis: the impact of the imaging techniques. Echocardiography. Sep 1993;10(5):497-508. [Medline].
  • Palka P, Lange A, Donnelly JE, Nihoyannopoulos P. Differentiation between restrictive cardiomyopathy and constrictive pericarditis by early diastolic doppler myocardial velocity gradient at the posterior wall. Circulation. Aug 8 2000;102(6):655-62. [Medline].
  • Rajagopalan N, Garcia MJ, Rodriguez L, et al. Comparison of new Doppler echocardiographic methods to differentiate constrictive pericardial heart disease and restrictive cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. Jan 1 2001;87(1):86-94. [Medline].
  • Rivenes SM, Kearney DL, Smith EO, et al. Sudden death and cardiovascular collapse in children with restrictive cardiomyopathy. Circulation. Aug 22 2000;102(8):876-82. [Medline].
  • Schulz-Menger J, Friedrich MG. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiomyopathies: when and why. Herz. Jun 2000;25(4):384-91. [Medline].
  • Shabetai R. Controversial issues in restrictive cardiomyopathy. Postgrad Med J. 1992;68 Suppl 1:S47-51. [Medline].
  • Shabetai R. The Pericardium. New York: Grune & Stratton;1981:211.
  • Shabetai R. Sarcoidosis and the heart. Curr Treat Options in Cardiovasc Med. 2000;2(5):385-98.
  • Spyrou N, Foale R. Restrictive cardiomyopathies. Curr Opin Cardiol. May 1994;9(3):344-8. [Medline].
  • Strobel JS, Fuisz AR, Epstein AE, Plumb VJ. Syncope and inducible ventricular fibrillation in a woman with hemochromatosis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. Oct 1999;3(3):225-9. [Medline].
  • Suzuki T, Ohtaki E, Murai T, et al. Idiopathic restrictive cardiomyopathy with diffuse perimyocytic fibrosis--a rare observation. Jpn Circ J. Mar 1997;61(3):272-4. [Medline].
  • Vallebona A. Cardiac damage following therapeutic chest irradiation. Importance, evaluation and treatment. Minerva Cardioangiol. Mar 2000;48(3):79-87. [Medline].
  • White CS. MR evaluation of the pericardium. Top Magn Reson Imaging. Fall 1995;7(4):258-66. [Medline].
  • White CS. MR evaluation of the pericardium and cardiac malignancies. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. May 1996;4(2):237-51. [Medline].
  • Zieman SJ, Fortuin NJ. Hypertrophic and restrictive cardiomyopathies in the elderly. Cardiol Clin. Feb 1999;17(1):159-72, ix. [Medline].

Cardiomyopathy, Restrictive excerpt

Article Last Updated: Feb 9, 2005