Continually Updated Clinical Reference
 
 
  All Sources     eMedicine     Medscape     Drug Reference     MEDLINE
 
eMedicine - Mesothelioma, Malignant : Article by

Quick Find
Authors & Editors
Introduction
Differentials
Radiograph
CT SCAN
MRI
Ultrasound
Nuclear Medicine
Intervention
Multimedia
References

Related Articles
Asbestos-Related Disease

Congestive Heart Failure

Empyema

Localized Fibrous Tumor of the Pleura

Lung, Metastases

Renal Cell Carcinoma




Patient Education
Click here for patient education.



Author: Elizabeth K Dee, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, Denver Health Medical Center

Elizabeth K Dee is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association and Radiological Society of North America

Coauthor(s): Kavita Garg, MD, Professor, Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center

Editors: Judith K Amorosa, MD, FACR, Clinical Professor and Program Director, Department of Radiology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School; Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital; Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand; W Richard Webb, MD, Chief of Thoracic Imaging, Professor, Department of Radiology, University of California at San Francisco; Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute; Eugene C Lin, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center

Author and Editor Disclosure

Synonyms and related keywords: malignant pleural mesothelioma, MPM, diffuse mesothelioma, asbestos exposure, Butchart staging system

Background

Mesothelioma is a malignant neoplasm originating from pleural or peritoneal surfaces; this condition is usually associated with occupational exposure to asbestos. Wagner et al connected asbestos to mesothelioma in a classic 1960 study of 33 patients with mesothelioma who were exposed to asbestos in a mining area in South Africa's North Western Cape Province.1 Of the 33 patients, 32 had been exposed to crocidolite, the most carcinogenic type of asbestos.

Asbestos mining and production peaked from the 1930s-1960s, and asbestos was used in a variety of products ranging from construction supplies to brake linings. During World War II, hundreds of thousands of civilian and military workers, through their occupations, were exposed to asbestos. Production slowed dramatically in the 1970s as the health risks of asbestos became known. Governmental restrictions were placed on its use, and alternative materials became available. Despite these changes, asbestos continues to be used in the manufacture of some fire safety products.

The clinical latency period between asbestos exposure and mesothelioma development is 35-40 years, and as a result, the number of mesothelioma patients has continued to rise despite decreased asbestos production.

Pathophysiology

The 2 subgroups of asbestos are termed amphiboles and serpentines. Amphiboles are long needlelike fibers with high length-to-diameter ratios and are resistant to dissolution. These fibers remain in the tissues for years. Crocidolite is the amphibole most available commercially and is strongly associated with mesothelioma.

Serpentines have a corkscrew shape and are more soluble. Chrysotile, the lone serpentine, accounts for 80-90% of commercial asbestos used in the United States and Canada. Chrysotile is less toxic than crocidolite because of its smaller length-to-diameter ratio, increased tissue solubility, and tendency to deposit in the central airways. Chrysotile that has been contaminated with tremolite (a noncommercial amphibole) has been suggested as the only occupational cause of mesothelioma, although this is not accepted universally. The mechanism by which asbestos fibers cause mesothelioma is not well understood. One possible explanation is that malignant transformation of cells follows a foreign-body reaction that is caused by the insoluble fibers.

The "families" of asbestos fibers are as follows:

  • Serpentine - Chrysotile
  • Amphibole - Crocidolite (strongly associated with mesothelioma), amosite, anthophyllite, tremolite, actinolite

The 3 primary pathologic types of mesothelioma are epithelioid, sarcomatoid, and biphasic. Patients with epithelioid mesothelioma (55-65%) have a slightly better median survival time. Pathologically, the epithelioid subtype can appear similar to adenocarcinoma. Special staining and immunohistochemical and ultrastructural analysis are necessary to differentiate the 2 diseases. Sarcomatoid mesotheliomas (10-15%) are similar in appearance to true sarcomas. Biphasic mesothelioma (20-35%) has both epithelioid and sarcomatoid features.

On gross pathologic examination, mesothelioma is a grayish, lobulated pleural tumor that usually spreads by direct extension into adjacent structures such as the lungs, mediastinum, and chest wall. Peritoneal mesothelioma usually occurs as a direct extension of pleural disease across the diaphragm, but the peritoneum can be the primary site of disease.

Two of the most common mesothelioma staging systems are the Butchart system2 and the tumor, node, metastases (TNM)-based system (see Table) that was introduced by the International Mesothelioma Interest Group.3

The Butchart staging system for malignant pleural mesothelioma is as follows2:

  • Stage I - Tumor confined to the ipsilateral pleura, lung, or pericardium
  • Stage II - Tumor invades the chest wall or mediastinal structures or metastasizes to the thoracic lymph nodes
  • Stage III - Tumor penetrates the diaphragm to involve the peritoneum or metastasizes to the extrathoracic lymph nodes
  • Stage IV - Distant blood-borne metastases

TNM Staging System for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma3

Stage Location
T1aIpsilateral parietal pleura only (including mediastinal and diaphragmatic pleura), without visceral pleura involvement
T1bIpsilateral parietal pleura (including mediastinal and diaphragmatic pleura), with scattered foci of visceral pleural involvement
T2Ipsilateral pleural surface has at least 1 of the following:
  • Diaphragmatic muscle involvement
  • Confluent visceral pleural tumor involvement (including fissures)
  • Extension from visceral pleura into the pulmonary parenchyma
T3Locally advanced but resectable tumor; each ipsilateral pleural surface has at least 1 of the following:
  • Involvement of the endothoracic fascia
  • Extension into the mediastinal fat
  • Solitary, completely resectable tumor focus in the chest wall soft tissues
  • Nontransmural involvement of the pericardium
T4Locally advanced, technically unresectable tumor; each ipsilateral pleural surface has at least 1 of the following:
  • Diffuse extension or multifocal chest wall masses, with or without rib destruction
  • Direct transdiaphragmatic extension into the peritoneum
  • Direct extension to the contralateral pleura
  • Direct extension to 1 or more mediastinal organs
  • Direct extension into the spine
  • Extension through to internal surface of the pericardium, with or without pericardial effusion or myocardial involvement
NXRegional lymph nodes not assessable
N0No regional lymph nodes metastases
N1Metastases in the ipsilateral bronchopulmonary or hilar lymph nodes
N2Metastases in the subcarinal or ipsilateral mediastinal lymph nodes, including the ipsilateral internal mammary nodes
N3Metastases in the contralateral mediastinal, contralateral internal mammary, and the ipsilateral or contralateral supraclavicular lymph nodes
MXDistant metastases not assessable
M0No distant metastases
M1Distant metastases present

Frequency

United States

Annually, approximately 1.0-1.1 in 100,000 people present with mesothelioma.4 The incidence rate of mesothelioma is highest in the Pacific and Mid-Atlantic states and may be related to the location of industries such as shipyards.5

International

The incidence rate of mesothelioma varies greatly among nations and is difficult to document in countries without mesothelioma registries. Crude incidence rates are highest in Australia, Belgium, and Great Britain (about 30 cases per million annually).6 The incidence rates of mesothelioma tend to be high in industrialized countries where asbestos was widely used; however, for unknown reasons, the incidence rates have also been reported to be low in some countries where there was wide use of asbestos.6

Mortality/Morbidity

Malignant mesothelioma is usually fatal. Death generally occurs within 18 months of symptom onset.

Race

No racial predisposition is recognized.

Sex

The incidence rate of mesothelioma is much lower in women than in men, probably because fewer women than men worked outside the home in the mid-20th century; therefore, they were less exposed to asbestos. Between 4- to 6-fold more men than women are affected by mesothelioma.4

Age

Mesothelioma is most commonly diagnosed at age 50-70 years, with the greatest incidence rates at age 65 and older in both sexes.4

Clinical Details

Mesothelioma usually appears 35-40 years after asbestos exposure. The onset of symptoms is insidious, and patients often experience symptoms for 4-6 months before the diagnosis is made. The most common symptoms are as follows:

  • Recent onset of shortness of breath (31%)
  • Recent increase in shortness of breath (30%)
  • Chest pain (43%)

Other symptoms include the following:

  • Cough (35%)
  • Weight loss (23%)
  • Weakness (18%)
  • Increased sputum production (18%)

The most common findings on physical examination (79%) are signs of pleural effusion (eg, dullness to percussion, decreased breath sounds).

Patients with peritoneal involvement experience symptoms as follows:

  • Abdominal pain (60%)
  • Anorexia (27%)
  • Weakness (12%)
  • Nausea (11%)

The most common signs of peritoneal mesothelioma include the following:

  • Abdominal distention (56%)
  • Ascites (37%)
  • Weight loss (38%)
  • Abdominal mass (11%)

Adams et al also described decreased chest excursion (15%), palpable lymph nodes (12%), and a palpable liver (9%).7

The primary risk factor for mesothelioma is asbestos exposure. Occupations with the highest risk of such exposure include insulation work, asbestos production, the heating trades, shipyard work, and construction. In some patients, no specific asbestos exposure can be found; frequently, these patients have worked in a job where the exposure was not recognized.

An interesting example of unrecognized asbestos exposure was a factory in Nottingham, England, where women manufactured gas masks during World War II using asbestos that was imported from Australia. Not until 1965, when the first patient from the factory was diagnosed with mesothelioma, did an astute doctor begin to suspect the etiology of her disease. By 1996, of the 1200 women, 67 were diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma.

Other predisposing factors include sharing households with asbestos workers and living near asbestos mines and factories. Nevertheless, mesothelioma without asbestos exposure does occur. In a study of 80 children with mesothelioma, only 2 were known to have been exposed to asbestos.8

Although industrial asbestos exposure accounts for most instances of mesothelioma, reports indicate that another environmental mineral fiber is also implicated as a risk factor for this tumor. Nearly 50% of deaths in 3 Turkish villages in central Cappadocia, where a mineral fiber termed erionite was found in the rocks, resulted from mesothelioma.9

Interestingly, there is no association between smoking and mesothelioma.

The diagnosis of mesothelioma should be made with care. A clinical history of asbestos exposure and radiologic findings that are consistent with mesothelioma warrant inclusion of mesothelioma in the differential diagnosis, but it is important to stress that a diagnosis of mesothelioma cannot be made exclusively with imaging studies. Other more common diseases such as benign asbestos-related pleural disease and metastatic adenocarcinoma can look radiographically identical to mesothelioma. Biopsy with special staining and immunohistochemical and ultrastructural analysis are absolutely essential for the accurate diagnosis of mesothelioma.

Mesothelioma is very difficult to treat; the treatment is usually surgical, although other treatment options such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy are used. The 2 primary surgical interventions are pleurectomy and extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP).

Pleurectomy is usually a palliative procedure to relieve chest wall pain and prevent recurrent pleural effusions by stripping off the visceral and parietal pleura. Extensive debulking is possible, but incomplete resection is often seen along the diaphragmatic and mediastinal pleura.

EPP is an en bloc resection of the parietal and mediastinal pleura, lung, hemidiaphragm, and ipsilateral pericardium to remove all gross disease. EPP is indicated for stage I tumors without involvement of the mediastinal lymph nodes. No difference in overall long-term survival is seen between pleurectomy and EPP, but the disease-free survival period is improved with pleurectomy. EPP is a technically demanding surgery with significant morbidity.

The surgical complications of pleurectomy and EPP include pneumonia, bronchopleural fistulae, bronchial leaks, empyema, chylothorax, respiratory insufficiency, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, hemorrhage, cardiac volvulus, subcutaneous emphysema, incomplete tumor removal, and vocal cord paralysis.

Radiotherapy is usually palliative or adjunctive to surgery. Because mesothelioma is resistant to radiation, a dose of 4000 cGy is usually required to achieve adequate palliation. Brachytherapy (intrapleural implantation of radioactive isotopes) delivers high-dose radiation locally to the pleural space and is used for recurrent pleural effusions or diffuse miliary seeding of the pleura. Postoperative radiation therapy can prevent recurrence within chest wall incision sites. Complications of radiotherapy include nausea and vomiting, radiation hepatitis, esophagitis, myelitis, myocarditis, and pneumonitis with deterioration of pulmonary function.

Response of mesotheliomas to chemotherapy has been disappointing. Comparison of chemotherapy regimens has been difficult because of the relative rarity of the disease. Doxorubicin, one of the more commonly used single agents, has had response rates of 0-16%.

Several new therapies are undergoing evaluation for the treatment of mesothelioma. Immunotherapy has shown promise, particularly in patients with stage I disease. In one study, 38.4% of patients with stage IA disease demonstrated complete response after intrapleural administration of γ-interferon.10

Photodynamic therapy is also an adjuvant treatment under investigation. A light-activated photosensitizing drug is instilled intrapleurally and is excited by light of a certain wavelength to produce oxygen-free radicals that cause tumor necrosis.

Preferred Examination

  • Chest radiography is the initial screening examination.
  • Computed tomography (CT) scanning is preferred for staging the tumor.
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) complements CT scanning in some patients. MRI provides better delineation of soft tissues (better soft-tissue contrast) and allows imaging in the sagittal and coronal planes.
  • Positron emission tomography (PET) scanning may also be useful in delineating the extent of tumor or metastases.

Limitations of Techniques

Chest radiography has limited usefulness. The radiographic findings of mesothelioma are nonspecific and observed in other diseases, including metastatic carcinoma, lymphoma, and benign asbestos disease. Small malignant pleural effusions may not be observed on standard radiographs. Alternatively, large pleural effusions can obscure pleural thickening or masses; therefore, disease extent is frequently underestimated in radiographs.

CT scanning provides more and better information than plain radiography with regard to tumor characteristics and extent. Although MRI is superior to CT scanning in some areas, this advantage did not change the surgical treatment in a 1999 study by Heelan et al.11 Neither CT scanning nor MRI provides an unequivocal diagnosis of mesothelioma; tissue biopsy is required for the definitive diagnosis.



Asbestos-Related Disease
Congestive Heart Failure
Empyema
Localized Fibrous Tumor of the Pleura
Lung, Metastases
Renal Cell Carcinoma

Other Problems to Be Considered

Adenocarcinoma (lung, breast, ovarian, gastric)
Lymphoma
Thymoma
Leukemia
Myeloma
Renal cell carcinoma
Asbestos-related benign pleural disease
Infection (tuberculosis, fungal, bacterial) 
Tuberculous pleural thickening



Findings

The most common mesothelioma finding on radiographs is unilateral, concentric, plaquelike, or nodular pleural thickening. Pleural effusions are common and may obscure the presence of the underlying pleural thickening. The tumor frequently extends into the fissures, which become thickened and irregular in contour. A slight right-sided predominance is observed, possibly because of a larger pleural surface area. The tumor can rigidly encase the lung, causing compression of lung parenchyma, diaphragm elevation, intercostal space narrowing, and mediastinal shift toward the tumor. Calcified pleural plaques are present in 20% of patients with mesothelioma and are usually related to the previous asbestos exposure.

Lung nodules and hilar masses usually result from direct mesothelioma tumor extension into the lung parenchyma and mediastinal structures, such as lymph nodes, the pericardium, and the heart. Mechanical distortion of the hemithorax, chest wall masses, periosteal rib reaction, or rib destruction by the tumor are signs of advanced disease. Although usually unilateral, direct extension of the tumor across the mediastinum into the contralateral hemithorax does occur.

Degree of Confidence

Although a definite diagnosis cannot be made on the basis of plain film findings, new unilateral pleural thickening or effusion in a patient who has a history of exposure to asbestos is highly suggestive of mesothelioma.



Findings

CT scan findings are similar to those of plain films but are seen better and in more detail. Furthermore, pleural thickening and effusion can be distinguished with CT scanning. Nodular pleural thickening, pleural thickening greater than 1 cm, involvement of the mediastinal pleural surface, and concentric pleural thickening are all highly suggestive of malignant pleural disease, either mesothelioma or metastases. The tumor extent along the pleural surfaces and into the mediastinum, diaphragm, or chest wall can be evaluated much better with CT scanning than plain radiography. Chest wall invasion manifests as obliteration of fat planes or chest wall nodules. Diaphragmatic invasion, ascites, and omental caking are common CT scan findings of peritoneal mesothelioma.

False Positives/Negatives

Benign pleural plaques or pleural thickening from asbestos exposure may mimic the appearance of nodular pleural thickening in patients with mesothelioma.



Findings

MRI produces images in multiple planes and is superior to CT scanning in demonstrating solitary foci of chest wall invasion, endothoracic fascial involvement, and diaphragmatic invasion. Mesothelioma images on MRI demonstrate minimally increased T1 signals relative to the chest wall musculature and moderately increased signals on T2-weighted images or T1-weighted images that have been obtained following injection of gadolinium. Fibrous pleural plaques are usually isointense or less intense relative to muscle.

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (gadopentetate dimeglumine [Magnevist], gadobenate dimeglumine [MultiHance], gadodiamide [Omniscan], gadoversetamide [OptiMARK], gadoteridol [ProHance]) have recently been linked to the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) or nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy (NFD). For more information, see the eMedicine topic Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy. The disease has occurred in patients with moderate to end-stage renal disease after being given a gadolinium-based contrast agent to enhance MRI or MRA scans.

As of late December 2006, the FDA had received reports of 90 such cases of NSF/NFD . Worldwide, over 200 cases have been reported, according to the FDA. NSF/NFD is a debilitating and sometimes fatal disease. Characteristics include red or dark patches on the skin; burning, itching, swelling, hardening, and tightening of the skin; yellow spots on the whites of the eyes; joint stiffness with trouble moving  or straightening the arms, hands, legs, or feet; pain deep in the hip bones or ribs; and muscle weakness. For more information, see the FDA Public Health Advisory or Medscape.

Degree of Confidence

Inflammatory pleural disease may mimic the increased MRI signal intensity of mesothelioma.



Findings

Ultrasonography can demonstrate pleural thickening or effusions in patients with mesothelioma. This modality can be used as a guide for biopsy, but it is not typically used for assessment of the disease extent in patients with mesothelioma.



Findings

If surgical resection of the tumor is a possibility, a quantitative ventilation-perfusion scan helps in assessing the function of the contralateral lung.

PET scanning has been used, although not routinely, to evaluate mesothelioma and may help preoperatively by documenting the extent of lymph node involvement or distant metastases.

False Positives/Negatives

Pleural inflammation can also reveal increased uptake on PET scanning.



Percutaneous catheter drainage and pleurodesis may be used for treatment of pleural effusions secondary to mesothelioma.

Medical/Legal Pitfalls

  • Failure to recognize that mesothelioma cannot be diagnosed exclusively with imaging: A biopsy must be performed for a definitive diagnosis.
  • Failure to consider mesothelioma in an asbestos-exposed patient with unexplained and new pleural thickening or effusion



Media file 1:  Positron emission tomography (PET) scan in a male patient with known mesothelioma. Although PET scanning is not standard for the evaluation of mesothelioma, this image illustrates the extent of the disease into the mediastinum and peritoneum.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Nuclear Image

Media file 2:  Chest radiograph of a 65-year-old man with left-sided chest pain and biopsy-proven mesothelioma. The left lateral pleura is thickened and lobulated, which is often observed with mesothelioma.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  X-RAY

Media file 3:  Chest radiograph of a 58-year-old patient with mesothelioma and shortness of breath. This image reveals diffuse, left-sided pleural thickening, a pleural effusion, and ipsilateral volume loss.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  X-RAY

Media file 4:  Computed tomography scan of a 58-year-old patient with mesothelioma and shortness of breath (same patient as in Image 3). This image shows the extensive pleural thickening that is characteristic of mesothelioma, effusion, and reduction in the volume of the affected hemithorax.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  CT

Media file 5:  Chest radiograph of 65-year-old woman with a history of mastectomy for breast cancer and who had recurrent pleural and parenchymal metastases. This lateral chest radiograph demonstrates thickening of the major fissure and blunting of the posterior costophrenic angle. This appearance is indistinguishable from that of mesothelioma.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  X-RAY

Media file 6:  Computed tomography scan in a 68-year-old man with known asbestos exposure. Multiple biopsies were negative for mesothelioma, and the chest findings were attributed to benign, asbestos-related pleural disease, which is a diagnosis of exclusion.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  CT

Media file 7:  Computed tomography scan of the chest. This image demonstrates mesothelioma that extends into the chest wall. Note the concentric left pleural thickening, pleural effusion, reduction in volume of the left hemithorax, and the tumor nodules within the chest wall.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  CT

Media file 8:  Computed tomography scan in a 48-year-old man with right-sided chest pain and a "tight sensation," who worked as a welder in a Norfolk, Virginia, shipyard. This image shows that the thick inhomogeneous pleural rind encases the lung (causing volume loss) and extends into the major fissure.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  CT

Media file 9:  Computed tomography scan in a 70-year-old man with chronic cough, hoarseness, and a 20-lb weight loss over 3-4 months. This image demonstrates the left lung is surrounded by a thickened pleura.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  CT

Media file 10:  Computed tomography scan in a 71-year-old man with increasing dyspnea and a history of asbestos exposure several decades earlier. This image shows that the right lung is reduced in volume as a result of the encasing pleural rind. An associated pleural effusion and right lower-lobe rounded atelectasis are also seen.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  CT

Media file 11:  Magnetic resonance image (MRI) in a 72-year-old Veterans Administration patient with left-sided mesothelioma. Note that the MRI well delineates the soft tissues and, in particular, the thoracoabdominal interface at the diaphragm.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  MRI

Media file 12:  Computed tomography (CT) scan in a male Veterans Administration patient with a history of asbestos exposure and an enlarging abdominal girth. This upper CT scan slice reveals the calcified pleural plaques along the diaphragmatic surface that are associated with asbestos exposure. Ascites is seen lateral to the liver. Aspiration of the ascitic fluid demonstrated mesothelioma.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  CT

Media file 13:  Computed tomography (CT) scan in a male Veterans Administration patient (same patient as in Image 12). This lower CT scan slice demonstrates ascites, omental caking, and mesenteric thickening.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  CT



  1. Wagner JC, Sleggs CA, Marchand P. Diffuse pleural mesothelioma and asbestos exposure in the North Western Cape Province. Br J Ind Med. Oct 1960;17:260-71. [Medline].
  2. Butchart EG, Ashcroft T, Barnsley WC, Holden MP. Pleuropneumonectomy in the management of diffuse malignant mesothelioma of the pleura. Experience with 29 patients. Thorax. Feb 1976;31(1):15-24. [Medline].
  3. Rusch VW. A proposed new international TNM staging system for malignant pleural mesothelioma. From the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Chest. Oct 1995;108(4):1122-8. [Medline][Full Text].
  4. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2004. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results. Available at http://seer.cancer.gov/faststats/sites.php?stat=Incidence&site=Mesothelioma&x=16&y=18. Accessed August 13, 2007.
  5. Bang KM, Pinheiro GA, Wood JM, Syamlal G. Malignant mesothelioma mortality in the United States, 1999-2001. Int J Occup Environ Health. Jan-Mar 2006;12(1):9-15. [Medline].
  6. Bianchi C, Bianchi T. Malignant mesothelioma: global incidence and relationship with asbestos. Ind Health. Jun 2007;45(3):379-87. [Medline][Full Text].
  7. Adams VI, Unni KK, Muhm JR, et al. Diffuse malignant mesothelioma of pleura. Diagnosis and survival in 92 cases. Cancer. Oct 1 1986;58(7):1540-51. [Medline].
  8. Fraire AE, Cooper S, Greenberg SD, Buffler P, Langston C. Mesothelioma of childhood. Cancer. Aug 15 1988;62(4):838-47. [Medline].
  9. Carbone M, Emri S, Dogan AU, et al. A mesothelioma epidemic in Cappadocia: scientific developments and unexpected social outcomes. Nat Rev Cancer. Feb 2007;7(2):147-54. [Medline].
  10. Boutin C, Nussbaum E, Monnet I, et al. Intrapleural treatment with recombinant gamma-interferon in early stage malignant pleural mesothelioma. Cancer. Nov 1 1994;74(9):2460-7. [Medline].
  11. Heelan RT, Rusch VW, Begg CB, et al. Staging of malignant pleural mesothelioma: comparison of CT and MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Apr 1999;172(4):1039-47. [Medline][Full Text].
  12. Antman KH. Current concepts: malignant mesothelioma. N Engl J Med. Jul 24 1980;303(4):200-2. [Medline].
  13. Bonn D. Asbestos--the legacy lives on. Lancet. Apr 17 1999;353(9161):1336. [Medline].
  14. Boutin C, Schlesser M, Frenay C, Astoul P. Malignant pleural mesothelioma. Eur Respir J. Oct 1998;12(4):972-81. [Medline][Full Text].
  15. Ceresoli GL, Gridelli C, Santoro A. Multidisciplinary treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Oncologist. Jul 2007;12(7):850-63. [Medline][Full Text].
  16. Chaisaowong K, Aach T, Jäger P, et al. Computer-assisted diagnosis for early stage pleural mesothelioma: towards automated detection and quantitative assessment of pleural thickening from thoracic CT images. Methods Inf Med. 2007;46(3):324-31. [Medline].
  17. Flores RM, Akhurst T, Gonen M, et al. Positron emission tomography predicts survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Oct 2006;132(4):763-8. [Medline].
  18. Giesel FL, Bischoff H, von Tengg-Kobligk H, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of malignant pleural mesothelioma: a feasibility study of noninvasive assessment, therapeutic follow-up, and possible predictor of improved outcome. Chest. Jun 2006;129(6):1570-6. [Medline][Full Text].
  19. Harpole DH, Liptay MJ, DeCamp MM Jr, et al. Prospective analysis of pneumonectomy: risk factors for major morbidity and cardiac dysrhythmias. Ann Thorac Surg. Mar 1996;61(3):977-82. [Medline].
  20. Matanoski GM, Tonascia JA, Correa-Villaseñor A, et al. Cancer risks and low-level radiation in U. S. shipyard workers. J Radiat Res (Tokyo). Aug 10 2007;epub ahead of print. [Medline][Full Text].
  21. McDonald AD, McDonald JC. Malignant mesothelioma in North America. Cancer. Oct 1 1980;46(7):1650-6. [Medline].
  22. Miller BH, Rosado-de-Christenson ML, Mason AC, et al. From the archives of the AFIP. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. May 1996;16(3):613-44. [Medline][Full Text].
  23. Patz EF Jr, Rusch VW, Heelan R. The proposed new international TNM staging system for malignant pleural mesothelioma: application to imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Feb 1996;166(2):323-7. [Medline][Full Text].
  24. Patz EF Jr, Shaffer K, Piwnica-Worms DR, et al. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: value of CT and MR imaging in predicting resectability. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Nov 1992;159(5):961-6. [Medline][Full Text].
  25. Price B. Analysis of current trends in United States mesothelioma incidence. Am J Epidemiol. Feb 1 1997;145(3):211-8. [Medline][Full Text].
  26. Quint LE. PET: other thoracic malignancies. Cancer Imaging. 2006;6:S82-8. [Medline].
  27. Ribak J, Lilis R, Suzuki Y, Penner L, Selikoff IJ. Malignant mesothelioma in a cohort of asbestos insulation workers: clinical presentation, diagnosis, and causes of death. Br J Ind Med. Mar 1988;45(3):182-7. [Medline].
  28. Rusch VW, Crowley J, Giroux DJ, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the N descriptors in the forthcoming seventh edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. Jul 2007;2(7):603-12. [Medline].
  29. Rusch VW, Piantadosi S, Holmes EC. The role of extrapleural pneumonectomy in malignant pleural mesothelioma. A Lung Cancer Study Group trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Jul 1991;102(1):1-9. [Medline].
  30. Sterman DH, Kaiser LR, Albelda SM. Advances in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Chest. Aug 1999;116(2):504-20. [Medline][Full Text].
  31. Sterman DH, Recio A, Carroll RG, et al. A phase I clinical trial of single-dose intrapleural IFN-{beta} gene transfer for malignant pleural mesothelioma and metastatic pleural effusions: high rate of antitumor immune responses. Clin Cancer Res. Aug 1 2007;13(15):4456-66. [Medline].

Mesothelioma, Malignant excerpt

Article Last Updated: Aug 15, 2007